Homage vs Fake vs Genuine - Time Talk - Time Tech Talk - TimeTechTalk.com

TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > Homage vs Fake vs Genuine

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

Moderated by: 3T

Page: 1 2

Printer Friendly

Homage vs Fake vs Genuine

Author	Post

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 09:29 pm

GuitarAddict
Guest

Joined:
Location:
Posts:
Status:	Offline

I gotta say I don't understand all the emotion that goes with this debate on "homage" watches or why there's even a debate.

Yeah, I agree it's crossing the line if the maker copies the genuine to the point that it uses the genuine maker's name on the watch face/strap, etc, but if it only copies the look and feel and size, why is that a negative thing?

I know guys that drive replica Cobras and they're proud to do it. It's not like they're gonna say, "Thanks, I'll just wait until I can afford the REAL thing, thank you very much."

Martin guitars invented the Dreadnought guitar shape in the early 1930s. Since then every major and minor guitar maker in the world has absolutely copied the size and shape and even the construction to the point that if it weren't for the builders name on the headstock and perhaps a slightly different shaped pickguard, they would be indistinguishable from the "real" thing. Yes, Martin still makes the Dreadnought but so does does Taylor and Gibson, and Fender and so on and nobody's gripping about that.

There was a Japanese manufacturer in the 1970s that took it to the point that, while they used their name on the headstock, they copied the script, coloring, etc of Martin. They were successfully sued and had to stop. BTW, those guitars are fairly collectible now.

Anyone who has paid $5K for a top of the line Gibson Dreadnought is not going to take it very well if some yahoo comes up to him and says, "Why the copy, dude?. Can't afford a $2500 Martin?"

Some very reputable, and expensive, watchmakers build dive watches that the average person would have to look twice to see it's not a Rolex. Half a dozen reputable makers build copies of Nav B chronographs that appear virtually identical to me. Where's all the rage there?

Do people only gripe about copies if they're significantly less expensive than the real thing?

Looking at some of the other forums it seems the Panerai clones are the hot topic. And. it's usually an owner of a genuine Panerai that has the strongest reaction to the clones.

Now, I've never seen or held a genuine Panerai in person, or even a clone. And I know I'm the new person here, but, I gotta say again, I just don't get all the fuss over "homage" or "clones, or "near-copies" or whatever you want to call them. So long as they they don't say Panerai Radiomir or Luminor Mariner or whatever on the face, why does it matter?

OK, blast away at me, I can take it. :D:D:D

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 09:49 pm

scottran
3T WIS

Joined:	Thu Jan 24th, 2008
Location:	Southwestern Pa, Pennsylvania USA
Posts:	2230
Status:	Offline

Say you were self employed and you created a product and called it a widgit. You spent thousands of dollars on research and development and use only the finest materials to make your product. You have built a reputation for having a quality product that is in demand. Then comes along some schmo that just goes out and buys one of your widgits. He just makes a copy of it,(no money spent on r&d). Uses inferior materials and calls it a widgedt. He sells it for a lower price and cuts into your earnings. Do you think you may be a little pissed off??

Last edited on Thu Dec 17th, 2009 09:50 pm by scottran

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 09:58 pm

mike03
3T WIS

Joined:	Sun Oct 5th, 2008
Location:
Posts:	95
Status:	Offline

Personally, I have no problem with homage watches. Yes, some probably also make true counterfeits/replica versions but as long as the homage version has its own brand name it does not bother me. I had an Alpha PO years ago. Not a bad watch for 50 bucks and no way it was ever being confused with a real one. Omega is not losing business to Alpha and probably doesn't give them an iota of thought. Many companies make homage subs and honor a particular model with a version of their own. Some companies are held in high esteem for their versions/homages but others are vilified? Go figure. Some people get crazy emotional at the shear mention of the word "homage". Whatever flames these emotions, to each his own. Now if the discussion were about "replica watches" I would have a completely different opinion. As there are companies intentional trying to copy to the point, its nearly impossible to pick which is the real one, that is just wrong. Some of these replicas are expensive watches with many of the same features of the original. These are potentially taking away business and confusing the market. I would be very nervous buying a used high end watch on ebay or a forum for fear it might be a fake. Several people on the forums have been burned in this way. The whole replica topic gets my blood boiling but homages, I am ok with! :)

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 09:59 pm

Paxman
3T WIS

Joined:	Sun Apr 23rd, 2006
Location:	NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA
Posts:	15957
Status:	Offline

Your blurring the lines between a replica or copy and an homage.

Your guitar analogy doesn't really fit imho. Everyone know the tone from a Martin is going to be different from the Gibson guitar built to darn near the same spec. As you stated the Japanese copy with matching script had to cease and desist when they replicated the Dreadnought all the way.

Consider the homage... well then consider the multitude of Submariner styled dive watches one can find. The case, bracelet dial hands all may be of the same style but none actually claim the replicate the Rolex guts. You know what you are getting and no one tries to hide that fact.

A replica is just that; an exact copy usually sold to an unknowing boob. I know a guy who traded a car for a 50th anniversary sub. I looked at it and could see at least 5 points in which the replica just missed. He was ass out. The makers of replicas are in essence stealing from the known producer of the genuine article. Now I would imagine anyone who buys a Rolex off the street for $50 bucks would know its a fake so is there any harm in that?

The rant I have recently made is that you have vendors selling what you could call homages. However these very same vendors are also selling replicas. The only reason you have the proliferation of these cheap homages is the fact a WIsS won't buy a fake but will buy and damn near exact copy so long as it is sterile or marked with some sort of a branding name different from the original. My contention is that by purchasing the homage from these guys you are in essence supporting them which proliferates their business of making fakes.

Do I expect everyone who likes the look of a Rolex Sub to go out and grab one? No of course not, but they are free to purchase many very reasonably priced Swiss made homages should they choose. They will get a lot more use and pleasure out of it than the cheap replica with crap plastic movement which will stop running in a matter of months. A true WIS just wouldn't consider wearing the fake. My sister in law returned from a trip to China with two fairly good Rolex fakes; a Daytona and President. I sized them and wore them around the house for a day. I felt dirty when I was out doors with the neighbors and they commented on my new watch. Before I could even think I blurted out it was a POS fake Rolex... but that's just me. May be some other douche would have conjured a back story to go along with the fake which only makes them a fake wearing a fake.:shock:

Do yourself a favor... go the the nearest Pam AD and check them out. I do every so often and they always are ready to cut a deal. I like being married so I always head home to a cold shower.;)

And bear in mind this is just my opinion and you know what opinions are like...

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 10:00 pm

Natevan70
Guest

Joined:
Location:
Posts:
Status:	Offline

That's a slippery slope to tread I think. To my thinking I don't own anything I'd consider an homage. That said; I have an O&W that looks quite a bit like the older Rolex divers, and many current models from any number of makers. I think that sometimes form has to follow function- there is only so much you can do to a watch. When someone crosses the line it's like porn; you know it when you see it.

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 10:15 pm

GuitarAddict
Guest

Joined:
Location:
Posts:
Status:	Offline

scottran wrote:
Say you were self employed and you created a product and called it a widgit. You spent thousands of dollars on research and development and use only the finest materials to make your product. You have built a reputation for having a quality product that is in demand. Then comes along some schmo that just goes out and buys one of your widgits. He just makes a copy of it,(no money spent on r&d). Uses inferior materials and calls it a widgedt. He sells it for a lower price and cuts into your earnings. Do you think you may be a little pissed off??

Do you think a company that makes and sells $6000 watches is really losing sales because I buy an inferior quality watch for a fraction of his price?

It's a different a story if the copy uses his branding and/or uses proprietary processes and/or designs.

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 10:56 pm

scottran
3T WIS

Joined:	Thu Jan 24th, 2008
Location:	Southwestern Pa, Pennsylvania USA
Posts:	2230
Status:	Offline

GuitarAddict wrote: scottran wrote:
Say you were self employed and you created a product and called it a widgit. You spent thousands of dollars on research and development and use only the finest materials to make your product. You have built a reputation for having a quality product that is in demand. Then comes along some schmo that just goes out and buys one of your widgits. He just makes a copy of it,(no money spent on r&d). Uses inferior materials and calls it a widgedt. He sells it for a lower price and cuts into your earnings. Do you think you may be a little pissed off??

Do you think a company that makes and sells $6000 watches is really losing sales because I buy an inferior quality watch for a fraction of his price?

It's a different a story if the copy uses his branding and/or uses proprietary processes and/or designs.
As a collector of many things and a business man I am talking products in general. I also collect antique tractors, mainly John Deere. JD still holds the rights to many of their products, even ones 80 years old. Companies are only allowed to sell JD oficially licensed products. If not, Deere will have their lawyers on you so fast your head will spin. It protects JD's name and it also protects me as a collector.
I have no problems with homage watches as they arent completely replicating the original. I would be embarrassed to wear a Fauxlex.
The Cobra thing is a good question also. I dont know what to say about it. I am considering building one once the economy gets better. Up until recently I would have said no problem with the replicas because they werent building 65 Shelby Cobras anymore. But, now Shelby is making them again. One just sold at BJ in Vegas in oct. Not as valuable as an original but still a Shelby. I saw many "clones" of different cars sell at Barret Jackson and some brought decent money. I think it is becoming an acceptable practice to do this as long as you are on the up and up about the lineage of the car in the car hobby. ;)

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 11:09 pm

GuitarAddict
Guest

Joined:
Location:
Posts:
Status:	Offline

scottran wrote:
GuitarAddict wrote: scottran wrote:
Say you were self employed and you created a product and called it a widgit. You spent thousands of dollars on research and development and use only the finest materials to make your product. You have built a reputation for having a quality product that is in demand. Then comes along some schmo that just goes out and buys one of your widgits. He just makes a copy of it,(no money spent on r&d). Uses inferior materials and calls it a widgedt. He sells it for a lower price and cuts into your earnings. Do you think you may be a little pissed off??

Do you think a company that makes and sells $6000 watches is really losing sales because I buy an inferior quality watch for a fraction of his price?

It's a different a story if the copy uses his branding and/or uses proprietary processes and/or designs.
As a collector of many things and a business man I am talking products in general. I also collect antique tractors, mainly John Deere. JD still holds the rights to many of their products, even ones 80 years old. Companies are only allowed to sell JD oficially licensed products. If not, Deere will have their lawyers on you so fast your head will spin. It protects JD's name and it also protects me as a collector.
I have no problems with homage watches as they arent completely replicating the original. I would be embarrassed to wear a Fauxlex.
The Cobra thing is a good question also. I dont know what to say about it. I am considering building one once the economy gets better. Up until recently I would have said no problem with the replicas because they werent building 65 Shelby Cobras anymore. But, now Shelby is making them again. One just sold at BJ in Vegas in oct. Not as valuable as an original but still a Shelby. I saw many "clones" of different cars sell at Barret Jackson and some brought decent money. I think it is becoming an acceptable practice to do this as long as you are on the up and up about the lineage of the car in the car hobby. ;)

In my mind, there are two deciding criteria:

1. Is intellectual property being stolen?
2. Is there an intent to deceive?

Let's use Panerai and Precista as an example because that's really what I'm talking about.

1. Is it an issue of the design or manufacture being stolen? I don't think so (Thank God for generic medicine or I would have gone bankrupt a long time ago).
2. Does the "homage" watch list deceitful branding? No.

Therefore, I personally have no problem purchasing and wearing a Precista "homage" I do worry about some guy seeing it and taking umbrage and creating a fuss which I wouldn't take well.

Speaking of Barrett-Jackson. I'm attending in January for the first time. Really looking forward to it.

Peace

Chris

Posted: Thu Dec 17th, 2009 11:54 pm

scottran
3T WIS

Joined:	Thu Jan 24th, 2008
Location:	Southwestern Pa, Pennsylvania USA
Posts:	2230
Status:	Offline

No problem with homages like I said. Just the fakes. You will love B-J. I had a blast in Vegas. Already making plans to go to Palm Beach in april. I will have to find a way to make AZ and now they will be in CA also. See this thread for pics from Vegas. http://timetechtalk.com/view_topic.php?id=18408&forum_id=3

Posted: Fri Dec 18th, 2009 12:19 am

Ronin1111
3T WIS

Joined:	Thu Mar 12th, 2009
Location:	Fort Myers
Posts:	224
Status:	Offline

scottran wrote: GuitarAddict wrote: scottran wrote:
Say you were self employed and you created a product and called it a widgit. You spent thousands of dollars on research and development and use only the finest materials to make your product. You have built a reputation for having a quality product that is in demand. Then comes along some schmo that just goes out and buys one of your widgits. He just makes a copy of it,(no money spent on r&d). Uses inferior materials and calls it a widgedt. He sells it for a lower price and cuts into your earnings. Do you think you may be a little pissed off??

Do you think a company that makes and sells $6000 watches is really losing sales because I buy an inferior quality watch for a fraction of his price?

It's a different a story if the copy uses his branding and/or uses proprietary processes and/or designs.
As a collector of many things and a business man I am talking products in general. I also collect antique tractors, mainly John Deere. JD still holds the rights to many of their products, even ones 80 years old. Companies are only allowed to sell JD oficially licensed products. If not, Deere will have their lawyers on you so fast your head will spin. It protects JD's name and it also protects me as a collector.
I have no problems with homage watches as they arent completely replicating the original. I would be embarrassed to wear a Fauxlex.
The Cobra thing is a good question also. I dont know what to say about it. I am considering building one once the economy gets better. Up until recently I would have said no problem with the replicas because they werent building 65 Shelby Cobras anymore. But, now Shelby is making them again. One just sold at BJ in Vegas in oct. Not as valuable as an original but still a Shelby. I saw many "clones" of different cars sell at Barret Jackson and some brought decent money. I think it is becoming an acceptable practice to do this as long as you are on the up and up about the lineage of the car in the car hobby. ;)
I may be way off on this, but if I remember the Shelby story correct, the reason he is making them again is because he had 16-20 chassis that were serial numbered from the original line. meaning they were registered and listed as cars from the original set he built, also allowing him to build them to the same (or as close as possible in todays world) specs as the first cobras. Not Kit cars mind you. (which are more true to the watch analogy than the new cobra sales) But original cobras that were NEVER built from back in the day.
Now as far as the "homage" argument goes, I stated my case the other day, and I own 2 real pams, and 3 homages/marina militares. (but listed as those, not parnis or Panerai. ) And I am ok with it.
on a side note , I also wore a fake sub to work once that I bought in New york for like 40 bucks. (wasted drunk, not that that makes it alright) The watch looks, feels and holds time and power reserve amazingly. Yet, no one questioned me on it since I am a "watch guy" But I also couldnt help myself and had to blurt out that it was fake every time I recieved a comment on it. I too felt dirty and wrong, and literally havent worn it since. However, (and I sort of mentioned this in my other post) I have no problem wearing a Marina Militaire, and will wear my Pam the very next day. Without guilt, my pams still love me.

Posted: Fri Dec 18th, 2009 12:33 am

oagaspar
Site Founder

Joined:	Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location:	Akron, USA
Posts:	28138
Status:	Offline

an homage is not a replica and I think that speaks for itself and more than enough has been discussed on that subject of replicas here and not welcomed...and I think Mark/Pax spelled it out pretty good!

and Chris since you mention Precista every WIS knows when Eddie decides to build an homage it is always of a vintage watch that regardless of how much money one may have they probably will never own an original because there are just not that many available nor were made...and when you mention Panerai take a minute and think....just how many different cases do they actually use?....you can almost make a case(no pun intended) that Panerai makes homages of Panerais...:D

Eddies LE models are works of art and well thought out with just enough detail to give you the feel of what an original may be like...in many cases right down to the movements used...The PRS-20 LE vintage Panny homage used a Unitas handwind that is unrivaled by even some of the highest end watch companies and in his PRS-50 LE vintage Fifty Fathoms homage an A.Schild movement was used as in the original...it's this kind of subtle detail that makes owning one of Eddies LE's special....not to mention they hold their value and in most cases increase in value...his Dreadnought is a WIS legend and all of his LE models are very much sought after but rarely hit a sales forum and are equally as hard to buy direct if you don't act fast as they sell out overnight! ;)

Posted: Fri Dec 18th, 2009 01:06 am

GuitarAddict
Guest

Joined:
Location:
Posts:
Status:	Offline

oagaspar wrote:
an homage is not a replica and I think that speaks for itself and more than enough has been discussed on that subject of replicas here and not welcomed...and I think Mark/Pax spelled it out pretty good!

and Chris since you mention Precista every WIS knows when Eddie decides to build an homage it is always of a vintage watch that regardless of how much money one may have they probably will never own an original because there are just not that many available nor were made...and when you mention Panerai take a minute and think....just how many different cases do they actually use?....you can almost make a case(no pun intended) that Panerai makes homages of Panerais...:D

Eddies LE models are works of art and well thought out with just enough detail to give you the feel of what an original may be like...in many cases right down to the movements used...The PRS-20 LE vintage Panny homage used a Unitas handwind that is unrivaled by even some of the highest end watch companies and in his PRS-50 LE vintage Fifty Fathoms homage an A.Schild movement was used as in the original...it's this kind of subtle detail that makes owning one of Eddies LE's special....not to mention they hold their value and in most cases increase in value...his Dreadnought is a WIS legend and all of his LE models are very much sought after but rarely hit a sales forum and are equally as hard to buy direct if you don't act fast as they sell out overnight! ;)

I think we're all in violent agreement. Replicas suck, homages are fine and, if you can afford it and have a desire for the genuine article, more power to you. My only point all along was, I think homages are fine and I don't know why they seem to upset some people. And they do.

I've read some very negative things on some of the other watch forums about PAM homages. Since I would very much like to have a PAM, but now can't afford it since my "retirement", I'm seriously considering tracking down a PRS-20 after the first of the year. While researching it, I came across some very strong (negative) opinions on them. I just questioned why. That's all.

As far as I'm concerned, the responses to this topic have addressed my questions. Thanks, everyone. G'nite. I'm going to bed. To dream of PAM 210 Radiomirs. Or morally and legally justifiable facsimiles thereof. :P:P:P

Chris

Current time is 01:56 pm	Page: 1 2
TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > Homage vs Fake vs Genuine	Top

Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1520 seconds (49% database + 51% PHP). 44 queries executed.