 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Apr 23rd, 2006 |
| Location: | NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA |
| Posts: | 15957 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Sure 1000m would be cool, but this is a big watch with a big glass and for 1000m it has to be quite thick in this diameter and the glass is a expensive part.
Also the case has to be thicker than.
1000m is cool but unnecessary imo, my aim is offering reliable watches. If we decide for a Eta and also 1000m we come in a area where some have to pass.
Even with ETA I want to try to keep it max $500 so I think 500m is enough $1 for each meter.
moresnowdays wrote:I really like the first drawing and bezel alot. It seems like the ideas for colors and the bracelet are going in the right direction. I'm curious about one thing that might seem trivial, not sure how many really care, but what about a 1000m depth rating. Is this possible?
Your first two watches had this rating, and it seems fitting for one called Megladon. Everything about it is big, robust and powerfull. The ultimate predator of the deep. To me 1000m puts it in it's own class were it belongs. Or maybe I'm off the deep end on this one;)
I would agree, Ralf. You have really got my attention with this beast!!:D