View single post by oagaspar
 Posted: Tue Oct 11th, 2005 07:07 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
oagaspar



Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28165
Status: 
Offline
RandyG wrote:

That would Worry Me as Well if someone misrepresented a Rep That is The Down Side!....Now If the Guy With the Fake Rolex recieved a Invicta in Trade... then He Got What He Deserved  I know of a highly trained watch expert, which we all know, who took a fake Rolex in trade for one of his most beloved diamond watch. He had to take it to a dealer to verify that it was a fake. Whatever anyone thinks of fakes that is the only part that  worries me.

 

CHEEPS wrote:
http://www.chronoguy.com/horology/fakepanerai/

As much as I enjoy the "activity" on another forum I inhabit, I have not got the strength to read 20 or 30 goofy posts over the right and wrong of fakes versus real.

So, here it is on this great forum!






















The fact of this controversy which captivates me most is the simple FACT that replica watch forums and sites are absolutelt thriving right now!

Most of the traditional watch forums are in the midst of a secular down turn and are relatively quiet except for regular posters and stalwarts. The fervor surrounding these fake/replicas gives evidence to the simple fact that people are buying these watches like crazy!






















HEY!  Someone kicked my soap box over!  That ain't right!


























Enjoy..........or not.























CHEEPS:dude:


VOTE FOR REPLICATO