 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Thu Jan 20th, 2011 |
| Location: | Land Of The Norsemen |
| Posts: | 720 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
very much guys! Really appreciate it, and Oscar, it`s good to be back 
To Stew, regarding size and compared to the 2254 (really looked long and hard for comparison pictures of the two myself, before I bought it. As I think the 2254 is the perfect size for me. But only found a few photos and not showing what I needed. So really happy if my photo can help you:=)
But even thoug the Sea Dweller sits quite a bit higher on the wrist, I still feel the SMP wears bigger. The SD kinda looks like a womens watch (can`t belive I said that ...) compared to most of my other watches, and is by far the smallest watch I own.
Also the SD has an about 1,5mm smaller dial than the Submariner, due to the thicker case on it. And as we know, layout and size of the dial will often be the prominent thing as to size, at least for looks. And also I think the case itself on the SMP just feels bigger due to the fatter lugs on it, and also the mor organic looking crown guard (much more edges on the SD)
When I bought the SD the seller also had a "Hulk" for sale, and as it has the same case (at least for size) I compared the two (sorry, no photos of that) And as the hulk has the new maxi dail and hands, it almost dwarfed (exagerating a bit here, hehe) the SD. At least it looked bigger. And that is dial alone.
Still getting used to the smaller size of the SD here, but as I smell love in the air here, I guess I`ll get used to my new petit.
