TimeTechTalk.com Home

TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > OT > Spywares!!! Unbelievable!!! Must read for all!!!!.....

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

 Moderated by: 3T Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3   
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Spywares!!! Unbelievable!!! Must read for all!!!!.....  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 09:36 am
  PM Quote Reply
25th Post
KenC
Admin


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Florida &, Arizona USA
Posts: 11288
Status: 
Offline
RichardWilkinsIII wrote: Here's the link again.  The real world explanation as to why Macs are better, dollars and cents wise, than peecees. 

http://www.macvspc.info/pages/01f-pc_myths_debunked.html

And, just some food for thought here Sir Ken.   Just because the vast majority of people choose one product over another doesn't mean the product is better.  It usually means that one product had a better marketing strategy than the other.   I like to compare the to companies to automobiles.  You definately get what you pay for.  And, I for one, would much rather drive a Porche than a Ford. (No slam on Ford intended, I've owned several and have no issues with Ford.)

 

I read the article, however, there are several flaws in it, the main one being..........who is this guy and what are his credentials???  As far as I know, it could have been written by Steve Jobs.

That said, my debate is not whether or not MAC is technologically better than PC.....it is what is better in the world of business, especially from an educational standpoint for those entering and having to compete in that world.  The truth is that PC and the Windows operating system so dominates that universe that it is, in fact, the de facto standard around which, the world revolve.  Yes, there are niche area of MAC and PCs with LINUX and there are UNIX based machines, but never has an OS been able to successfully usurp Microsoft, not even the full power of IBM,in Microsoft's infancy, could redirect users to something else.

Bottom line, to compete in today's world, as it currently exists and has for a decade or more, as a rule, one must learn to live with PC/Windows.........and that makes it better.  Whether or not it is superior is an academic debate as was BETA vs VHS.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 11:14 am
  PM Quote Reply
26th Post
RichardWilkinsIII
3T WIS


Joined: Tue Sep 13th, 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
Posts: 197
Status: 
Offline
You make a good point Ken.  I have no idea who the guy who wrote that article is working for.  I think alot of the facts that he cites are probably verifiable.  If you look at alot of "reputable" publications, I think you'll find that most of them are saying that the debate is over. The Mac is the better machine and will continue to kick Microsofts butt when it comes to operating systems. The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and PC World are a few of the places where I've read this. I think there was a time when you could say that those entering the business world needed to know how to operate a windows OS.  But, I think what is important to know now, is that the windows operating system has been evolving (with every delayed release) to mimic the Mac OS.  With Macs now shipping with Intel chips as a standard, and the ability to run Windows natively on a Mac, the lines become very blurred.  I don't think anyone will be able to say that there is software that they need, that they can't get on a mac. Honeslty, I think that there will be a bunch of people who will try the Mac OS, realise how hassle free it is and switch.  But, to echo one of your points Ken, this is a debate that will never come to an end.  It's kind of like the diehard Chevy guy who will never, ever buy a Ford.  It's just fun to debate every once in a while. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 12:16 pm
  PM Quote Reply
27th Post
watchboy
3T WIS


Joined: Mon Sep 5th, 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 1245
Status: 
Offline
Good debate guys!

Yes!!! Richards!!! Like for me, I will never buy a BMW though it is good!!! Cos I don't have to!!!!
:P:P:P:P However, I will not buy a Chevy or Ford either! Or even a Porsche(too high for me!:?:?:?)!!!! :P:P:P

RichardWilkinsIII wrote:
You make a good point Ken.  I have no idea who the guy who wrote that article is working for.  I think alot of the facts that he cites are probably verifiable.  If you look at alot of "reputable" publications, I think you'll find that most of them are saying that the debate is over. The Mac is the better machine and will continue to kick Microsofts butt when it comes to operating systems. The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and PC World are a few of the places where I've read this. I think there was a time when you could say that those entering the business world needed to know how to operate a windows OS.  But, I think what is important to know now, is that the windows operating system has been evolving (with every delayed release) to mimic the Mac OS.  With Macs now shipping with Intel chips as a standard, and the ability to run Windows natively on a Mac, the lines become very blurred.  I don't think anyone will be able to say that there is software that they need, that they can't get on a mac. Honeslty, I think that there will be a bunch of people who will try the Mac OS, realise how hassle free it is and switch.  But, to echo one of your points Ken, this is a debate that will never come to an end.  It's kind of like the diehard Chevy guy who will never, ever buy a Ford.  It's just fun to debate every once in a while. 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 12:34 pm
  PM Quote Reply
28th Post
RichardWilkinsIII
3T WIS


Joined: Tue Sep 13th, 2005
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
Posts: 197
Status: 
Offline
Yeah, I'm right there with ya.  I'd love to buy an X5 or a 700 series.  Someday.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 12:40 pm
  PM Quote Reply
29th Post
watchboy
3T WIS


Joined: Mon Sep 5th, 2005
Location: Greece
Posts: 1245
Status: 
Offline
Hey Richard, there new X5 is due next year! It is a 5 to 7 seaters(optional) SUV. Bigger than the current in size! :)

RichardWilkinsIII wrote:
Yeah, I'm right there with ya.  I'd love to buy an X5 or a 700 series.  Someday.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Mon May 8th, 2006 08:27 pm
  PM Quote Reply
30th Post
KenC
Admin


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Florida &, Arizona USA
Posts: 11288
Status: 
Offline
RichardWilkinsIII wrote: You make a good point Ken.  I have no idea who the guy who wrote that article is working for.  I think alot of the facts that he cites are probably verifiable.  If you look at alot of "reputable" publications, I think you'll find that most of them are saying that the debate is over. The Mac is the better machine and will continue to kick Microsofts butt when it comes to operating systems. The Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and PC World are a few of the places where I've read this. I think there was a time when you could say that those entering the business world needed to know how to operate a windows OS.  But, I think what is important to know now, is that the windows operating system has been evolving (with every delayed release) to mimic the Mac OS.  With Macs now shipping with Intel chips as a standard, and the ability to run Windows natively on a Mac, the lines become very blurred.  I don't think anyone will be able to say that there is software that they need, that they can't get on a mac. Honeslty, I think that there will be a bunch of people who will try the Mac OS, realise how hassle free it is and switch.  But, to echo one of your points Ken, this is a debate that will never come to an end.  It's kind of like the diehard Chevy guy who will never, ever buy a Ford.  It's just fun to debate every once in a while. 
 

I think you will find that when people start mounting the Windows OS on their MACs, that MAC will lose its "hassle-free" rep, because, after all, it is the OS that is attacked by hackers, virus "evil-doers" and spyware.............not the hardware.  An MS OS will be vulnerable no matter wahere it is mounted simply because of its dominance.

And, you are absolutley right that BG is mimicking the MAC OS with Windows......he didn't fall off a turnip truck.  Take a look at the new IE7....I think you'll find it looks remarkably like Firefox (without all of the plug-ins).  Fortunately or unfortunately, this is what Microsoft does best.............it dominates the sofware world whether by in-house design, take-over or pushover..............not approving or disapproving, just stating the facts.  Remeber when Word Perfect (not MS WORD) dominated the word processing world?  And Lotus, not Excel, dominated spreadsheet software.....and, of course, nobody ever heard of Access, 'cause it was all about dBase.

You may not like Billy, but he has done more than anyone to revolutionize personal and business computing (and IBM thought it was just a fad - LMAO!).

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Wed May 10th, 2006 11:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
31st Post
RIKMEISTER
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Sep 8th, 2005
Location:  
Posts: 246
Status: 
Offline
i use dr spyware.  works great.  it will not let it even install any spyware on my pc.  i think it is 29.95 per year.  but well worth it.  and for antivirus i use avg  which is always freee.  at http://www.grissoft.com

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 04:34 am Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3     
TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > OT > Spywares!!! Unbelievable!!! Must read for all!!!!..... Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0906 seconds (32% database + 68% PHP). 30 queries executed.