|
|
| Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You! |
| Moderated by: 3T | Page:   1 2 3 4   |
|
|||||||||||||
| This comment must be out of...................... | Rate Topic |
| Author | Post |
|---|
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:20 pm |
|
25th Post |
|
caesarmascetti Guest
|
I would submit to you that there are far more warranties that are non transferrable, or tansferrable for a fee, than not. Regardless of the product not just in the watch industry. IWC and Omega that I know of do not honor warranties of anyone but the original buyer. Does that make these companies any less reputable? The only thing I see O7 as doing wrong regarding their warranty is that if the previous poster is accurate they changed their policy mid stream. Short of that I see nothing wrong in giving the original buyer the one that actually contributed to the companies coffers preferential treatment regarding warranties. Just my opinion.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:31 pm |
|
26th Post |
|
Gregger 3T WIS 
|
caesarmascetti wrote: I would submit to you that there are far more warranties that are non transferrable, or tansferrable for a fee, than not. Regardless of the product not just in the watch industry. IWC and Omega that I know of do not honor warranties of anyone but the original buyer. Does that make these companies any less reputable? The only thing I see O7 as doing wrong regarding their warranty is that if the previous poster is accurate they changed their policy mid stream. Short of that I see nothing wrong in giving the original buyer the one that actually contributed to the companies coffers preferential treatment regarding warranties. Just my opinion. I could be wrong but being the owner of two omegas....my AD did not fill in the warrenty cards and these are considered open....therefore, if I sell this watch to someone they can fill in the info and they will have the warrenty....At least that's what they say on the sales forums.....
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:34 pm |
|
27th Post |
|
KenC Admin 
|
caesarmascetti wrote: I would submit to you that there are far more warranties that are non transferrable, or tansferrable for a fee, than not. Regardless of the product not just in the watch industry. IWC and Omega that I know of do not honor warranties of anyone but the original buyer. Does that make these companies any less reputable? The only thing I see O7 as doing wrong regarding their warranty is that if the previous poster is accurate they changed their policy mid stream. Short of that I see nothing wrong in giving the original buyer the one that actually contributed to the companies coffers preferential treatment regarding warranties. Just my opinion. Then we will agree to disagree as I see you belong to the school of "everybody else is doing it so it must be right", but let's not pretend it's because the manufacturer hasn't made a profit on the product and been paid for the full warranty period. I belong to the school of "If it's wrong, it's wrong...regardless of who is (and how many are) doing it"! Like my mother used to say, "Just because everybody else is rioting in the streets doesn't make it right"!
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:41 pm |
|
28th Post |
|
caesarmascetti Guest
|
we will agree to disagree then.
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 06:43 pm |
|
29th Post |
|
caesarmascetti Guest
|
I purchased an Aqua Terra 6 mos. ago and the AD filled mine out.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 07:00 pm |
|
30th Post |
|
Skipdawg 3T WIS 
|
Well I think Croton watches has the right idea. If the watch maker believes in the product they make and sell the warrenty given should cover the issues covered by the warrenty for life. :cool:
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 07:45 pm |
|
31st Post |
|
KenC Admin
|
Skipdawg wrote: Well I think Croton watches has the right idea. If the watch maker believes in the product they make and sell the warrenty given should cover the issues covered by the warrenty for life. :cool: hand6.gifhand6.gifhand6.gif....the Mermel is a man of honor!
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 07:59 pm |
|
32nd Post |
|
Skipdawg 3T WIS
|
KenC wrote: Skipdawg wrote:Well I think Croton watches has the right idea. If the watch maker believes in the product they make and sell the warrenty given should cover the issues covered by the warrenty for life. :cool: Yes Ken the man rocks! yourock.gif
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Tue Jul 8th, 2008 11:25 pm |
|
33rd Post |
|
zippofan 3T WIS 
|
I bought an O7 G-1 after I noticed the similarity between it and the Steinhart/Debaufre GMT watches. It is a nice watch, though the micro adjustment on the bracelet is useless because of the diver's extension. As a result I rarely wear it because I just can't get a good fit on my wrist. I know I could put it on a strap (and I have a spare Hirsch Trieste for it), but it just looks right on the bracelet. BTW, back when I was in to Accutrons, Mitch tossed me off the Yahoo Accutron group he moderated because of a post I made looking for a guy who had one of mine for repair and then wouldn't answer emails/telephone calls. That pretty much turned me off original hummers and vintage watches in general. Unless I could get a mint Deep Sea that needs no work... :D Cheers, Griff Oh yeah, I did get the Accutron back, untouched, after nearly a year...
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 09:34 am |
|
34th Post |
|
KenC Admin
|
zippofan wrote: I bought an O7 G-1 after I noticed the similarity between it and the Steinhart/Debaufre GMT watches. It is a nice watch, though the micro adjustment on the bracelet is useless because of the diver's extension. As a result I rarely wear it because I just can't get a good fit on my wrist. I know I could put it on a strap (and I have a spare Hirsch Trieste for it), but it just looks right on the bracelet. Oh, yeh...that Mitch...what a guy! face4.gif
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 04:11 pm |
|
35th Post |
|
caesarmascetti Guest
|
oh well, I've never had an issue with O7 or Mitch, and I have 3 of his products, but judging from the posts quite a few people here have had issues.Hmmm, a shame really as some of his offerings are quite nice. Oh well to each his own.
|
||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
| Posted: Wed Jul 9th, 2008 04:20 pm |
|
36th Post |
|
Skipdawg 3T WIS
|
caesarmascetti wrote: oh well, I've never had an issue with O7 or Mitch, and I have 3 of his products, but judging from the posts quite a few people here have had issues.Hmmm, a shame really as some of his offerings are quite nice. Oh well to each his own. If you buy watches enough or become a collector your going to see good and bad and inbetween along the way and you will see all sides from everyone. Like with everything else in life no two see things the same or have the same good or bad situations. When it comes down to it you have to decide on what is good or bad for you whether it be watches or the best place to go out for lunch. ;)
|
|||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| Current time is 04:02 am | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > This comment must be out of...................... | Top |
