TimeTechTalk.com Home

TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > MK II Project Seamaster 300

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

 Moderated by: 3T
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
MK II Project Seamaster 300  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Fri Jan 8th, 2010 09:28 pm
  PM Quote Reply
1st Post
murphy j
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Oct 11th, 2007
Location: Home Again With My Loving Family
Posts: 1613
Status: 
Offline
Did anyone else do the survey and get the e-mail for early dibs on the pre-order? I sent my pre-order deposit today and figure this is going to be my one major purchase this year. Even though completed watches aren't due to ship till the first quarter of 2011, I'm pretty excited about this one.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jan 9th, 2010 11:30 am
  PM Quote Reply
2nd Post
Paxman
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 23rd, 2006
Location: NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 15957
Status: 
Offline
Funny didn't get one and I have been a customer.:shock: You got more info?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jan 9th, 2010 12:25 pm
  PM Quote Reply
3rd Post
Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
Any pics of this project???

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jan 9th, 2010 12:57 pm
  PM Quote Reply
4th Post
oagaspar
Site Founder


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28504
Status: 
Offline
here you go...hand6.gif

http://www.mkiiwatches.com/WSWrapper.jsp?mypage=le_300.htm

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sat Jan 9th, 2010 01:01 pm
  PM Quote Reply
5th Post
Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
Thanks O!

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Sat Jan 9th, 2010 11:36 pm
  PM Quote Reply
6th Post
murphy j
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Oct 11th, 2007
Location: Home Again With My Loving Family
Posts: 1613
Status: 
Offline
Sorry I didn't respond sooner guys. I'm away at Drill this weekend and this is the first chance I've had to get online. The link Oscar posted is the same one I got in the e-mail. There's no pics yet of Project Seamaster 300, but I have no doubt that this will be a faithful modern interpretation of a Classic design.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Sun Jan 10th, 2010 12:00 am
  PM Quote Reply
7th Post
bigrustypig
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Apr 11th, 2009
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 7504
Status: 
Offline
Thanks, Oscar. Watch looks ok but a little on the small side for me. :?

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Jan 12th, 2010 02:41 am
  PM Quote Reply
8th Post
IanM
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 15th, 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1268
Status: 
Offline
Most of you will know that I had a Stingray 60 date red-tipped second hand for quite a while. I sold it because it was a 41 ~ 42mm watch and too small for me to read comfortably. Beautiful fit, finish, and a great timekeeper, though. Dibs to Mr Yao for his wonderful reworking of a classic - the BPFF - on that one.

I am not trying to "flame" anything - but what I can't get is that if you are going to pay upwards of 1K USD (to 1.3K at RRP) on a watch that you will probably wait a year for after paying your deposit and which is a re-interpretation of the original - why would one not consider something  like a watchco 300 (remade using all orig parts - case, dial, hands, movement etc) or one of the actual originals for a bit more $$? I have no doubt, though, that the watch when delivered will be a cracker - because Mr Yao has not ever built a dud. 

I know my argument falls flat when we consider the mighty Precista Dreadnought and other recent "re-interpretations" (cos they are more valuable than the watches on which they are based!) - but surely the price on this one is a bit over the top for a 42mm re-interpretation, albeit from a very respected manufacturer? :?

Maybe my opinion would be different if the watch was bigger and had something more special or unique about it?

Let the games begin! And remember it is only MY humble opinion...

Cheers! IanM hand6.gif 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Jan 12th, 2010 10:55 pm
  PM Quote Reply
9th Post
murphy j
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Oct 11th, 2007
Location: Home Again With My Loving Family
Posts: 1613
Status: 
Offline

Last edited on Tue Jan 12th, 2010 10:57 pm by murphy j

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Jan 12th, 2010 10:55 pm
  PM Quote Reply
10th Post
murphy j
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Oct 11th, 2007
Location: Home Again With My Loving Family
Posts: 1613
Status: 
Offline
IanM wrote: Most of you will know that I had a Stingray 60 date red-tipped second hand for quite a while. I sold it because it was a 41 ~ 42mm watch and too small for me to read comfortably. Beautiful fit, finish, and a great timekeeper, though. Dibs to Mr Yao for his wonderful reworking of a classic - the BPFF - on that one.

I am not trying to "flame" anything - but what I can't get is that if you are going to pay upwards of 1K USD (to 1.3K at RRP) on a watch that you will probably wait a year for after paying your deposit and which is a re-interpretation of the original - why would one not consider something  like a watchco 300 (remade using all orig parts - case, dial, hands, movement etc) or one of the actual originals for a bit more $$? I have no doubt, though, that the watch when delivered will be a cracker - because Mr Yao has not ever built a dud. 

I know my argument falls flat when we consider the mighty Precista Dreadnought and other recent "re-interpretations" (cos they are more valuable than the watches on which they are based!) - but surely the price on this one is a bit over the top for a 42mm re-interpretation, albeit from a very respected manufacturer? :?

Maybe my opinion would be different if the watch was bigger and had something more special or unique about it?

Let the games begin! And remember it is only MY humble opinion...

Cheers! IanM hand6.gif 

Ian, you make some valid points and I don't see your reasoning as a flame at all. My wife even asked me why not get an original. I'd love to have an original, but would be a bit apprehensive about wearing it, for fear of doing some irrepairable damage to it. There's also the problem of so many fakes. The Watchco Seamaster 300s are great and on the 'I hope to have someday list', but tend to be a bit scarce and pricey when they turn up. I trust Bill Yao will bring something out that is quality, a great timekeeper, true to the original yet modern and in what is for me, a wearable size. I tend to be most comfortable in the 40-42mm range. I also like the fact that it's a limited edition and I'm getting in on the first run. Yes, I'll have to wait a year or possibly more for it, but I need the time to save up the rest of the funds :D.

Last edited on Tue Jan 12th, 2010 11:07 pm by murphy j

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Jan 12th, 2010 11:41 pm
  PM Quote Reply
11th Post
IanM
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 15th, 2007
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1268
Status: 
Offline
All agreed, murph!

I am not averse to the homage thing - I had an O7 LM-7 as you will remember. It sure generated a lot of comments from non-WIS and WIS alike, but I just got tired of explaining to people that it was a great watch, based on the wonderful original Omega. Resolution to self - get the original!

WISdom is a funny thing, murph - I like that you get in on the original batch, I like that you get time to save (but you lose the use of the dosh up front, because there is still a "maybe" from Bill Yao about building it in the first place...), and I genuinely believe that the MKII 300, when completed, is bound to be a terrific one and be at least the equivalent of the very nice Precista version. I would still love to see pics of it when it hits your wrist and I think no less of people who are going to be buying it. After all - some say that MKII is at least as good as the original in many circumstances! And on the MKII - I bet the lume will be bountiful, unlike the many fakes and oldies that are out there in the market! 

Otherwise - the new MKII 300 will be a fine watch, no doubt, murph - and you'll still be justifiably as proud as hell when it arrives.

Thanks for allowing me to comment! IanM hand6.gif

 

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

Current time is 12:53 pm  
TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > MK II Project Seamaster 300 Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1131 seconds (39% database + 61% PHP). 26 queries executed.