View single post by Skipdawg
 Posted: Sun Jun 15th, 2008 11:19 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Skipdawg



Joined: Thu Mar 29th, 2007
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 14965
Status: 
Offline
 Could they be mis identifying the older Eta 2688 or 2852 witch had 17j? the 2824 replaced those in most newer watching with the like complication.

If not maybe there was a 17j 2824 in the early days of the movement. If so not very common but being stated in a few places makes one think less likely a typo.