| View single post by KenC | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Dec 20th, 2008 01:27 pm |
|
||||||||||||
KenC
|
mcwright wrote: In my experience, rarely does an acquistion result in the acquired being allowed to continue doing business as usual. No matter how many times the companies say things won't change, they do. I would say in the typical acquisition, you would be 100% correct, but the difference here being that Seiko already had (and has had for some years)the ability to "take over" the company. They owned 52% of it which is controlling interest in anybodies' book. At 52% ownership, they chose not to make changes...I'm not sure why an additional 28% would...it doesn't give them anymore "power" than they already had. Time will tell!
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||