 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Apr 23rd, 2006 |
| Location: | NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA |
| Posts: | 15957 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Tony Duronio wrote:KenC wrote:Tony Duronio wrote:Did you have your coffee yet ol' buddy:D
http://www.timetechtalk.com/view_topic.php?id=17125&forum_id=1
and I think the 21 Jewel is a better movement than the 2824 This might be a 2834/2892??? I'm sure the experts will chime in.
As a matter of fact...no, but I am having it now...according to Pax's post, the watch was $100 more yesterday at $249....and it was about the 5th thread down!
Did you assume because your a "SENIOR" member of the forum, you wouldn't have to dig for infoPax miss quoted the price yesterday, it was $149. He just got so carried away at getting another Wisconsin Badger colored watch that his brain moved faster than his fingersgoofy
As a "SENIOR" member of the forum, I was doing my duty and correcting his gross error which no one else had done...even those that had already noticed his post!
You are lucky I was busy today... Did I say $249? I was just testing you guys...:shock: And yes I was happy to get another Badger watch... especially at $129 with 2836. So there!!goofy
Remember Tony, we don't want any age discrimination so we need to give Ken the little extra breathing room...