 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Thu Apr 16th, 2009 |
| Location: | Arctic, Norway |
| Posts: | 5821 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I have the same watch and what I have always wanted to do is to upgrade the lume. First off, the quality of the lume they used is not as good as it could be. Second, the hour markers on the face are a little rectangles and triangles that are a mix of blingy stainless on the edges and lume in the centers. That means less lume applied to each hour marker. Net result is weak lume applied to limited surface = disappointing...especially when compared to my Orange Monster or Glycine Lagunare SE...both of which are lume machines.
Agree: The lume is thin on this dial...Tissot should make a second generation of Seastar 1000 in full stainless and big lume: That would be a success!
Here's an under-water pic
Last edited on Fri Aug 28th, 2009 03:19 am by Hammerfjord