 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Tue Feb 19th, 2008 |
| Location: | USA |
| Posts: | 207 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
I love where this discussion is going!
BRP, why would you suggest the sub with date as opposed to the Sea-dweller? Note, I can't see myself buying a dssd. I have the bubble on my Boschett RR and I gotta say, I'm not a super fan of the bubble. Love the watch but the bubble kind of distracts from the fantastic blue face.
I talked to my AD and he said that apparently Rolex will remove the bubble for me, however, it would probably leave a small right. I'm guessing in the AR coating. I'm not really a fan of having a ring on my crystal. Hence why I'm thinking that the SD would be a good choice.
Does anyone here have a SD? I'm curious to see their thoughts on it, especially compared to the Sub.
Ian, I'd love to see a shot of your Gold Daytona!!! Maybe next to the res of your subs??? Please?I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one here who'd like to see it. And please don't forget your camera when you go to get the info on any new models on the horizon.
At 40mm the Sub is the smallest watch in my "family" and it is dwarfed by its larger siblings. Is it a problem? Absolutely not.
You should know, however, that contrary to what your AD has told you, Rolex will not remove the cyclops on the crystal. Also if you send your Sub in to RSC for service without the cyclops Rolex will replace the crystal or it will not service the watch.
