 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Sep 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | Florida &, Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 11288 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
So, am I the only one that's pretty impressed with the final outcome? Don't get me mixed up with an Invicta fanboy as I only own two, each of which were second hand. But for DD to come out and issue a public statement essentially holding hands with Invicta has got to say something about the legitimacy here. I know this subject can get pretty rowdy, so take it easy on me, OK?
This is not a personal attack, but I feel you just glanced at the letter and didn't thoroughly read it...If you really read it, it is not that impressive. All DD says is that the modules are genuine and that Invicta bought them second hand (instead of properly sourcing them from the manufacturer). It also states that Invicta did a miserable job of assembling the modules in the case and inspecting them for quality before selling them to an unsuspecting public...and that both DD and Lalo take no responsibility for the loudmouthed, rantings and lies about the situation broadcast by Lalo's pet con-man...but we all know that he doesn't say anything without Lalo's consent!
So...I don't know whether you are the only one who is impressed by the public statement in which DD says Lalo is and idiot and a poor manufacturer with no quality control processes or not...but I, for one, am not!
And yes...I also own 3 very nice Invicta's that were manufactured years ago...but because of the name, I am now too embarrassed to wear them in public (not a snob...but don't want to be taken for a fool either)!