View single post by Hammerfjord | |||||||||||||
Posted: Sat Apr 2nd, 2011 04:29 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Hammerfjord![]()
![]() |
Jeep99dad wrote:I thought I'd post this from the company intro by the owner on another forum. It provides his opinion on the mvt as some expressed their concerns about the pricey Resco using this old modified non hacking Russian mvt. I've been reading this stuff before... First: A watch don't have to be guaranteed for such treatment to be able to pass it. He present the 2824-2 like a movement who would be too weak to withstand the SEAL training...? Bullcrap! Marathon uses the 2824-2 as I said earlyer and there's no surprise there. I tested it in the cold myself:http://www.timetechtalk.com/view_topic.php?id=19567&forum_id=1&highlight=marathon+cold+test Remember that a watch on a living man's wrist would NEVER be exposed to so low temperature as the one I let in the snow all night. This is what the 2824-2 can take on low temperature: -13 celsius without going out of COSC specs. For the shock test: I was using my Seastar 1000 Tissot(housing a 2824-2) on the northern-most LNG plant(Snow white), working 12 hours a day in row for 14 days, hammering keys to free and lock bolted huge flanges before high pressure torquing... The 2824-2 took all the beating without any trouble, even when the 1kg hammer riped off from a key and accidently smashed right on the watch's face: To be said, if I didn't have the watch, my wrist's bones would have break in. The 2824-2 took it again. Honnestly: What is up there? The Slava was cheaper, that's for sure...Better? Prove it to me!
|
||||||||||||
|