View single post by e.avery
 Posted: Sat Oct 14th, 2006 09:36 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
e.avery



Joined: Tue Apr 4th, 2006
Location: Kentucky USA
Posts: 2722
Status: 
Offline
 You may not agree with me, but that does not make me wrong.  I got paid to think out side of the box in the watch industry, and have been fortunate enough to retire because of my forward thinking beliefs and not being tied to a rigid belief system, and listening to others tell me that it could not be done.

tny795 wrote:
Okay, let's try this a different way.

For me personally, a dress watch is 14K gold, 18K if possible.  I want neither complications nor bling......can't stand bling.  The preferred hands are Bruguet in style.

It must have a bracelet, no strap--don't care what exotic it could be.  Too, the dial must be white and on the smaller size--20-25mm, w/crown. 

For most women, I think, the question of fitting nicely/comfortably under a sleeve is not applicable as it must be  for a man.

I think I've covered it all.  I wish more of us would get in on this.  I do not agree with eavery's:   it is what the person who wears it feels about it and how it makes them feel.  My old, old Stuhrling bubble copies are NOT dress, imho, nor are my new Explorer, Pilot, nor even my gorgeous Elysee Penelope.   I really think the appearance of the piece makes a big difference.