| View single post by tny795 | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Oct 14th, 2006 10:22 pm |
|
||||||||||||
tny795
|
Oh, I'm very sorry. I never meant to even hint that you were wrong. We differ in opinion,that's all. Out of curiosity, you don't consider any one+ of your more dressy than others? The start of this thread was why dress watches weren't given more play. Yet, we haven't covered exactly what makes a dress watch. You said, and OG agreed, that you both wear dress watches a big percentage of the time. What I'm trying to figure out is: what do the 2 of you, and others, consider "dress". You and he and Ken, plus who knows how many others here, have much larger collections than I but, out of all you do have, which, in your opinion makes your dress ones "dress". Okay, will stop now because my head's spinning at this point, and I very well may be repeating myself. .........:) e.avery wrote: You may not agree with me, but that does not make me wrong. I got paid to think out side of the box in the watch industry, and have been fortunate enough to retire because of my forward thinking beliefs and not being tied to a rigid belief system, and listening to others tell me that it could not be done.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||