 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Thu Apr 16th, 2009 |
| Location: | Arctic, Norway |
| Posts: | 5821 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
The 51.4mm diameter is not too big for some of us and the 28.5mm thickness still wearable even it would not fit under one's cuff.
But anyway, when you wear monsters, you don't wear suits...? No?
Still, to be really wearable, I think they should have make the bezel coming up to the crystal's bevelled edge. I don't mean an extra thick bezel, I mean a kind of conic formed insert who would rise from the bezel grip to the crystal's bevelled edge.
But the price of 26-33000 US$ will stop all the skinny wrists
http://rolexpassionreport.com/4345/there-it-is-the-new-51-mm-rolex-deepsea-challenger-super-submariner-of-james-cameron-waterproof-to-12-000-meter/