| View single post by pacifichrono | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri Dec 8th, 2006 10:33 am |
|
||||||||||||
pacifichrono
|
yamahaki wrote: I didn't think you could infringe on a style, not a brand. A tank is a general description, not a brand. That's what I thought, too. I guess Cartier introduced the name long ago and it 'enjoyed' expanded usage, kinda like Kleenex and Scotch tape.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||