 |
Full Topic |  |
| Joined: | Sun Sep 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | Akron, USA |
| Posts: | 28506 |
| Status: |
Online
|
Agreed as many members have different views...tastes and expressions...and that's what makes a Forum Great!hand6.gif....and exactly why I entered Pic #14 on behalf of the member who took the shot...that Pic says it all to me about the CS/QC of Orsa to me!:D:P
O.A. Gaspar wrote:KenC wrote:
The Orsa Sea Angler is actually a pretty sweet Watch imhohand6.gif...It's the 2 Guys who run the Company that SUCK!Votes should be made based on composition of Pic and not subject...at least that's how I look at itwatch2.gifjust mt 2 cents :P
If it didn't involve a POS ORSA, I'd have to vote for #14!!!
O you are right...
but on both counts an association muddles the reality.
Sea Anglers are great watches but because the douchebags who provide the watch the to the public are idiots, the watch suffers by association.
similar instance with the PO entries. You may judge purely on technical merits but the association with the watch can drive you rihgt by the technically best pic.
At least that's how it works for me...
So I think Sea Anglers and Orsa's are nice watches, but I have a general dsidain for them after our experience with the monkeys throwing feces at one another from Quebec to San Juan Capistrano...
And I am always conflicted when voting for the POW on 3T. As usual a bevy a fantastic shots of beautiful watches... except for #14... but the composition is nice!
Pax
