 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Fri Jun 22nd, 2007 |
| Location: | Gonzales, Louisiana USA |
| Posts: | 592 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
Great review.................but I still don't care much for the Ocean7..and Steve's comment about "....when the assembler put them together, they just grabbed out of the box without attention to maintaining the order...", is a perfect example of why. 1) That is a piss poor approach to quality control, and 2) it doesn't say much about customer service either. They may be good watches, but since I 1st saw their Forum, the arrogance of the product's manufacturer simply turned me off....they didn't try to sleazily hide the fact that they were using the SW200 (like Bathy's did), but they are certainly willing to make "mis-statements" about it!
Give me ENZO every time, Mitch and Ocean7 just don't hack it for me! jmho
You do realize that the LM-3 and the Enzo's are made by the same person/manufacturer correct? They are basically the same watch. Do you think this is the only company that assembles the same way? What the heck does assembling watches in numeric order have to do with quality control? I have to strongly disagree about any arrogance. They are the most open and forthright company I have seen yet. Can't say that about many either.