 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Sun Sep 4th, 2005 |
| Location: | Florida &, Arizona USA |
| Posts: | 11288 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
KenC wrote:steve6387 wrote:Tony Duronio wrote:No argument, but wouldn't you pay $10.00 more for the watch if done right? I would. So the minimal cost passed on would be a welcomed item.
You and I certainly would. But we're the vast minority. The real question is: Would John Q. Public pay that extra $10.00 or even know enough to ask about the lume in the first place?
--Steve
My point is...why does the manufacturer have to charge an additional 500% to 1000% ....Seiko (and others) put superluminova on watches that retail for as little as $20.
Missed this before, but Ken are you saying that Seiko does not have a proprietary lume, they just use Superluminova??? I did not know that.
Again...yes and no...Seiko does use their own in-house proprietary lume called Lumibrite...but it is very similar to SL !