| Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You! |
| Moderated by: 3T | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
romano 3T WIS
|
I was poking around Junkers website found this lume dial chrono coming out next month. 3133 powered. They also are releasing same case with a miyota 82xx full lume auto. Looks very cool to me. Wonder what the price point will be? ![]() |
|||||||||
|
Zarith 3T WIS
|
It looks very cool indeed hand6.gif I have a Junkers with the same case, the discontinued W33 6454-2 (with an ETA 2824). The problem with W33 collection is that the cases are too small. 40mm might be enough for a dress watch, but not for this military/pilot design. Every time I take mine out of the box, I'm shocked by its mini mini size. This new model should cost the same as the already available 6408-5, approx. $500. Personally I prefer the cleaner 6458-1. ![]() |
|||||||||
|
romano 3T WIS
|
I have scrawny wrists a huge watch for is a a 44mm can't do 47 I look like a bleached Flava Flav You could be right though about the Miyota version being cleaner . I like the lume dial . |
|||||||||
|
Skipdawg 3T WIS
|
They make some good watches. And their lume so far that I have seen is great. ;) |
|||||||||
|
Zarith 3T WIS
|
romano wrote:You could be right though about the Miyota version being cleaner . I like the lume dial . The non-chrono version is not a Miyota, but an ETA 2824-2 ;) The specs:
|
|||||||||
|
romano 3T WIS
|
Sorry your right I was looking at 6252-4 as well and confused them. I like it just as much with the ETA maybe more LOL. |
|||||||||