TimeTechTalk.com Home

TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > Gerald Genta, Daniel Roth and Bulgari Become One

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

 Moderated by: 3T  
AuthorPost
Skipdawg
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Mar 29th, 2007
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 14965
Status: 
Offline
Rather interesting.

http://tinyurl.com/2495e26

Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
The only thing is that many will react like me: They don't want to wear a trade who's associated to feminine products like perfumes,jewels,purses...
I prefered the "Daniel Roth" brand: It had a name in the watch-making...Bulgari don't: It just appear like a fashion brand.
I have way too much hair on my chest to wear something with "Bulgari" on the dial.
This name is too gay for medog smile.gif

bigrustypig
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Apr 11th, 2009
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 7504
Status: 
Offline
I don't know what to make of this yet but if Bulgari can tone down its logo/brand and instead amplify the Roth/Genta brands maybe that will help.crap.gif

 

Paxman
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 23rd, 2006
Location: NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 15957
Status: 
Offline
I don't think this is a great idea...crap.gif

bigrustypig
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Apr 11th, 2009
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 7504
Status: 
Offline
Paxman wrote: I don't think this is a great idea...crap.gif
I think it would have been better if Bulgari just bought the 2 brands and kept them "independent" --- existing and operating as separate brands. It will take lots of time for Bulgari to convince true WISdom to strap on a jewelry brand on their wrists.mini me.gif

tenbosch
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Aug 22nd, 2009
Location: New Jersey USA
Posts: 203
Status: 
Offline
I suppose it's only a matter of time until BVLGARI, BVLGARI, BVLGARI is plastered all over the new models...

Are all Bulgari owners the same? I was at a business function some time ago and I met this European dude wearing one of the BVLGARI BVLGARI BVLGARI watches.

Me: "Hey, that's a cool Bulgari! What model is it?"
Him (strong spanish accent): "I don't know. Why you some sort of watch freak?"
Me: "Yes, you could say that"
Him: "What are you wearing?"
Me: "Hamilton, vintage 1950ish..."
Him: "Oh, I thought you were really into watches. This watch probably costs more than your car"
Me: "Ok, didn't really answer the question, but have a great day!"...underbreath..."asshole"

Ever since then, I could care less about owning a Bulgari. It sorta spoke to who would wear such a watch plastered with advertisements.

Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
tenbosch wrote:
I suppose it's only a matter of time until BVLGARI, BVLGARI, BVLGARI is plastered all over the new models...

Are all Bulgari owners the same? I was at a business function some time ago and I met this European dude wearing one of the BVLGARI BVLGARI BVLGARI watches.

Me: "Hey, that's a cool Bulgari! What model is it?"
Him (strong spanish accent): "I don't know. Why you some sort of watch freak?"
Me: "Yes, you could say that"
Him: "What are you wearing?"
Me: "Hamilton, vintage 1950ish..."
Him: "Oh, I thought you were really into watches. This watch probably costs more than your car"
Me: "Ok, didn't really answer the question, but have a great day!"...underbreath..."a**hole"

Ever since then, I could care less about owning a Bulgari. It sorta spoke to who would wear such a watch plastered with advertisements.


There's not many explanations to that:
*His watch had a tourbillon complication and he is still an arrogant creep...
*His watch was loaded with diamonds and made of platinum and he's still an arrogant creep.
*His watch didn't have any of those features and the movement of this watch could just buy the thermometer of your car: He been f*cked and paid a fortune for the brand's name...Let's call this a f*cked arrogant creep.
My guess: He just knew nothing about watches, he just wanted to flash his wrist and his buks with a way to open mouth...
I would have flash his pretty face with a lightning smack
crusty.gif

Last edited on Mon Aug 2nd, 2010 12:53 pm by Hammerfjord

Paxman
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 23rd, 2006
Location: NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 15957
Status: 
Offline


I'm going to step in and comment asking to please stop the homophobic use of the term gay. Gay doesn't equal bad in my world and I find this connotation offensive. If this guy was an ass or straight up douche well then that's one thing. To equate this with gay is just not right. You don't have to condone homosexuality to feel as I do. I'm just not into discrimination in any form. I'm certain any number of us have friends or family who just might play for the other team. And no I'm not gay, bi-curious or simply light in my loafers. Let's leave the gay-bashing and narrow mindedness to the other low rent forums.


Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
Paxman wrote:


I'm going to step in and comment asking to please stop the homophobic use of the term gay. Gay doesn't equal bad in my world and I find this connotation offensive. If this guy was an ass or straight up douche well then that's one thing. To equate this with gay is just not right. You don't have to condone homosexuality to feel as I do. I'm just not into discrimination in any form. I'm certain any number of us have friends or family who just might play for the other team. And no I'm not gay, bi-curious or simply light in my loafers. Let's leave the gay-bashing and narrow mindedness to the other low rent forums.




I totally understand Mark.
I was refering to my first comment here as this Bulgari trade represent a feminin range of products at the origin. Meaning that a feminin product symbol or trade on a man's wrist was a bit non-straight in my eyes.
I have no problems with homosexuals and I don't bash them in everyday's life: They do what they want and it's not of my business. I don't have any phobia on this side and I never had any trouble with them because we allways repected our different tastes in life.
Sorry for the misunderstanding: I just personnaly dislike this feminin fashion and feel like it's not appropriated on a man's wrist. My own opinion only.

Paxman
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Apr 23rd, 2006
Location: NorthEastern, Wisconsin USA
Posts: 15957
Status: 
Offline
Hammerfjord wrote: Paxman wrote:


I'm going to step in and comment asking to please stop the homophobic use of the term gay. Gay doesn't equal bad in my world and I find this connotation offensive. If this guy was an ass or straight up douche well then that's one thing. To equate this with gay is just not right. You don't have to condone homosexuality to feel as I do. I'm just not into discrimination in any form. I'm certain any number of us have friends or family who just might play for the other team. And no I'm not gay, bi-curious or simply light in my loafers. Let's leave the gay-bashing and narrow mindedness to the other low rent forums.




I totally understand Mark.
I was refering to my first comment here as this Bulgari trade represent a feminin range of products at the origin. Meaning that a feminin product symbol or trade on a man's wrist was a bit non-straight in my eyes.
I have no problems with homosexuals and I don't bash them in everyday's life: They do what they want and it's not of my business. I don't have any phobia on this side and I never had any trouble with them because we allways repected our different tastes in life.
Sorry for the misunderstanding: I just personnaly dislike this feminin fashion and feel like it's not appropriated on a man's wrist. My own opinion only.

 

Thanks Will. I just want to be crystal clear for any members of anyone looking in. I completely understand your meaning. I just want to make sure it isn't misunderstood. Thanks!

Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Will. I just want to be crystal clear for any members of anyone looking in. I completely understand your meaning. I just want to make sure it isn't misunderstood. Thanks!


No problem Mark: You did your S.moderator job the right wayThumbsUp02.gif

Skipdawg
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Mar 29th, 2007
Location: Washington USA
Posts: 14965
Status: 
Offline
I always hated they hijacked a great word and name. gay to me is that word for jo;lly and fun my grandpa used back in the day. and I went to High school with a very beautiful girl named Gay.

That said of the 3 brands the only one I every really liked much was the Daniel Roth.

This is a beauty!!!

Attachment: DRTOURSKEL02.jpg (Downloaded 18 times)

Simon_Leung
3T WIS


Joined: Wed Mar 19th, 2008
Location: Richmond, Canada
Posts: 1209
Status: 
Offline
Watches designed by Gerald Genta:

1) 1966 Omega Constellation Pie Pan
2) 1972 Audemars-Piquet Royal Oak
3) 1976 Patek Philippe Nautilus


Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.0897 seconds (22% database + 78% PHP). 30 queries executed.