TimeTechTalk.com Home

TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > Latest Buzz on Peter Helson's Prototype

Welcome to 3T! Please take the time to register and join in on the friendly,knowledgeable watch talk.Please note that not all registrations will receive an immediate activation e-mail.Those who do not receive an immediate notification will be activated manually within 48hrs. by an admin. without an e-mail activation url sent to you,you may then sign in using your username and password,if you feel there is a problem please e-mail us at timetechtalk@hotmail.com and include your name and username and we activate your account.Thank You!

 Moderated by: 3T Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
Latest Buzz on Peter Helson's Prototype  Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 10:43 am
  PM Quote Reply
13th Post
FnuSnu99
3T WIS


Joined: Thu Jan 20th, 2011
Location: Land Of The Norsemen
Posts: 720
Status: 
Offline
Hammerfjord wrote: As much as I wasn't found of the Enzo, I kind of like this model.
Maybe not for those who worry about that the watch would not fit under them shirt's sleeve...
I never wear shirts so: No problemo.
47mm isn't surprisingly big.
Now for the 22.5mm thick: I don't see it as a major problem.
In fact, I don't see it as any problem at all, as I'm not gynecologistdog smile.gif
It's just like a Megalodon with 3.5mm thickness added: If you can wear a Meg without looking like a penguin having a tambourine on his wing, then it's fitting you...
toon1.gif
But Will, promis me that if you ever take up practice as a gynocologist, please leave your Egiziano hommage 60x24mm at home ...toon1.gif

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 12:02 pm
  PM Quote Reply
14th Post
Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
FnuSnu99 wrote:
Hammerfjord wrote: As much as I wasn't found of the Enzo, I kind of like this model.
Maybe not for those who worry about that the watch would not fit under them shirt's sleeve...
I never wear shirts so: No problemo.
47mm isn't surprisingly big.
Now for the 22.5mm thick: I don't see it as a major problem.
In fact, I don't see it as any problem at all, as I'm not gynecologistdog smile.gif
It's just like a Megalodon with 3.5mm thickness added: If you can wear a Meg without looking like a penguin having a tambourine on his wing, then it's fitting you...
toon1.gif
But Will, promis me that if you ever take up practice as a gynocologist, please leave your Egiziano hommage 60x24mm at home ...toon1.gif


I promis Rolf...I promissubtlelaugh.gif
I'll be gentle...
toon1.gif

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 12:23 pm
  PM Quote Reply
15th Post
stew77
Admin


Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2009
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 10252
Status: 
Offline
While not for me, I do like the combination Ti and Bronze construction, and as far as the dimensions go, this one is not ridiculously big.  I think the 'smallish', depth-gauge style design of the lugs lends to this case looking more bulbous than it really is (Now, I'm not saying the watch isn't big...it's big, just not ridiculously so IMO).  Of note, the blog states that the case thickness is the same as the Shark Diver (18mm), and that it is that custom, thick sapphire that brings the total thickness up to 22.5mm.

For reference, the ENZO Ref.500 that was posted on the blog back in November was 38mm thick, which sort of makes this Helson seem svelte. subtlelaugh.gif

I figured Jeff would like this one as anyone wearing the SMW 20,000 FEET would find this one to be a fair bit smaller in size.  Good thing they are both Ti construction!

No doubt this one will take out a few door jams if you are wearing it for desk diving, but I definitely think Peter has succeeded here knowing that the inspiration for this one is a vintage depth gauge.    ...to that end, it's a cool piece. 

Last edited on Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 01:05 pm by stew77

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 12:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
16th Post
blbarron
3T WIS


Joined: Sun Mar 7th, 2010
Location:  
Posts: 100
Status: 
Offline
Love my Shark Diver but don't think this one's for me. Never been a fan of the domed crystals. I like larger & thicker watches but this one's a bit much, 20mm is about my limit on thickness. I'm sure some of the thickness & crystal has to be there to maintain the 3500M water resistance as well though so there is a reason to the size.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 05:38 pm
  PM Quote Reply
17th Post
joecb
3T WIS


Joined: Thu May 14th, 2009
Location: East Hampton, New York USA
Posts: 1360
Status: 
Offline
Hi guys, haven't posted in a while....that said....I really do like the retro look of this.

I know I wouldn't wear it often, but it really appeals to me.

As said before, I like to combination of Ti and brass, also like the look of the crystal, real old school depth guage look, with the dial layout.

I think, based on price it would be a real collectors item, to mostly display.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 06:11 pm
  PM Quote Reply
18th Post
azpops
3T WIS


Joined: Fri Oct 15th, 2010
Location: Wherever The Job Takes Us, USA
Posts: 108
Status: 
Offline

Well guys/Gals, my comment regarding the "practicality" of this design was geared toward a daily wear watch.

However, I am a Big Fan of Peter Helson. Not only for his watches, but as the person behind them, as well as his awesome communication skills and customer service.

Truth be told, my only wish is that I was Flush again. Why? Because I’d love to be in a position to support him (as well as the many like him in this industry) by purchasing the many watches he‘s made available to us. Which btw, I emailed him in this regards.

Although he’s been one very busy fellow during the past year. He’s still taken the time to respond to my many emails in a extremely efficient and professional manner. I had a warranty issue with my first SD’r…I found that I had nothing to worry about, because the way Peter handled this situation…It went as smooth as silk!

Back to the term “practical”. Having time to think about this timepiece, this would not be a daily wear watch, but it would be a great watch to own not only for it’s obvious design's conversation value, but more importantly since it would be a part of the story/history behind the Helson Watch Co..

Lance

Last edited on Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 06:22 pm by azpops

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 08:31 pm
  PM Quote Reply
19th Post
oagaspar
Site Founder


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28152
Status: 
Offline
how about the crystal on this vintage Rolex that was strapped to the Trieste when it went to over 10,000ft.!...cool vid.ThumbsUp02.gif

http://www.rolex.com/en#/world-of-rolex/sports-and-culture/exploration/trieste

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 09:01 pm
  PM Quote Reply
20th Post
bigrustypig
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Apr 11th, 2009
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 7504
Status: 
Offline
stew77 wrote:
While not for me, I do like the combination Ti and Bronze construction, and as far as the dimensions go, this one is not ridiculously big.  I think the 'smallish', depth-gauge style design of the lugs lends to this case looking more bulbous than it really is (Now, I'm not saying the watch isn't big...it's big, just not ridiculously so IMO).  Of note, the blog states that the case thickness is the same as the Shark Diver (18mm), and that it is that custom, thick sapphire that brings the total thickness up to 22.5mm.

For reference, the ENZO Ref.500 that was posted on the blog back in November was 38mm thick, which sort of makes this Helson seem svelte. subtlelaugh.gif

I figured Jeff would like this one as anyone wearing the SMW 20,000 FEET would find this one to be a fair bit smaller in size.  Good thing they are both Ti construction!

No doubt this one will take out a few door jams if you are wearing it for desk diving, but I definitely think Peter has succeeded here knowing that the inspiration for this one is a vintage depth gauge.    ...to that end, it's a cool piece. 


Totally agree with you, Chris. The colors of ti and bronze were the comments I made on the Helsons in bronze you gents posted of late. Yes again, this is a size that really appeals to me and because my lifestyle is a mix of office and field, I can be flexible enough to wear this...with some adjustments on those door jambs.

On Oscar's point about the parrots, he is right too. Enzo's Lunar Landing Craft at 39mm is very similar to Peter's proto.

Anyway, I hope the price is friendly enough for me as my sonar is on PING PING PING mode now
anodie.gif

Last edited on Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 09:05 pm by bigrustypig

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 11:00 pm
  PM Quote Reply
21st Post
stew77
Admin


Joined: Thu Mar 26th, 2009
Location: Colorado USA
Posts: 10252
Status: 
Offline
bigrustypig wrote: stew77 wrote:
While not for me, I do like the combination Ti and Bronze construction, and as far as the dimensions go, this one is not ridiculously big.  I think the 'smallish', depth-gauge style design of the lugs lends to this case looking more bulbous than it really is (Now, I'm not saying the watch isn't big...it's big, just not ridiculously so IMO).  Of note, the blog states that the case thickness is the same as the Shark Diver (18mm), and that it is that custom, thick sapphire that brings the total thickness up to 22.5mm.

For reference, the ENZO Ref.500 that was posted on the blog back in November was 38mm thick, which sort of makes this Helson seem svelte. subtlelaugh.gif

I figured Jeff would like this one as anyone wearing the SMW 20,000 FEET would find this one to be a fair bit smaller in size.  Good thing they are both Ti construction!

No doubt this one will take out a few door jams if you are wearing it for desk diving, but I definitely think Peter has succeeded here knowing that the inspiration for this one is a vintage depth gauge.    ...to that end, it's a cool piece. 


Totally agree with you, Chris. The colors of ti and bronze were the comments I made on the Helsons in bronze you gents posted of late. Yes again, this is a size that really appeals to me and because my lifestyle is a mix of office and field, I can be flexible enough to wear this...with some adjustments on those door jambs.

On Oscar's point about the parrots, he is right too. Enzo's Lunar Landing Craft at 39mm is very similar to Peter's proto.

Anyway, I hope the price is friendly enough for me as my sonar is on PING PING PING mode now
anodie.gif

I would love to see you grab one of these Jeff!!!thumbsup.gif...Heck, even though I'm pretty sure this one is not for me, I'm slightly tempted to put this on my radar.  Like you said, it will definitely be interesting to see what the price point ends up being on this one.

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 11:19 pm
  PM Quote Reply
22nd Post
bigrustypig
3T WIS


Joined: Sat Apr 11th, 2009
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 7504
Status: 
Offline
stew77 wrote:
bigrustypig wrote: stew77 wrote:
While not for me, I do like the combination Ti and Bronze construction, and as far as the dimensions go, this one is not ridiculously big.  I think the 'smallish', depth-gauge style design of the lugs lends to this case looking more bulbous than it really is (Now, I'm not saying the watch isn't big...it's big, just not ridiculously so IMO).  Of note, the blog states that the case thickness is the same as the Shark Diver (18mm), and that it is that custom, thick sapphire that brings the total thickness up to 22.5mm.

For reference, the ENZO Ref.500 that was posted on the blog back in November was 38mm thick, which sort of makes this Helson seem svelte. subtlelaugh.gif

I figured Jeff would like this one as anyone wearing the SMW 20,000 FEET would find this one to be a fair bit smaller in size.  Good thing they are both Ti construction!

No doubt this one will take out a few door jams if you are wearing it for desk diving, but I definitely think Peter has succeeded here knowing that the inspiration for this one is a vintage depth gauge.    ...to that end, it's a cool piece. 


Totally agree with you, Chris. The colors of ti and bronze were the comments I made on the Helsons in bronze you gents posted of late. Yes again, this is a size that really appeals to me and because my lifestyle is a mix of office and field, I can be flexible enough to wear this...with some adjustments on those door jambs.

On Oscar's point about the parrots, he is right too. Enzo's Lunar Landing Craft at 39mm is very similar to Peter's proto.

Anyway, I hope the price is friendly enough for me as my sonar is on PING PING PING mode now
anodie.gif

I would love to see you grab one of these Jeff!!!thumbsup.gif...Heck, even though I'm pretty sure this one is not for me, I'm slightly tempted to put this on my radar.  Like you said, it will definitely be interesting to see what the price point ends up being on this one.


Chris, I just emailed Peter. Asked a few details. I will revert to you as soon as he replies. "Temptation.....I can resist anything but temptation" (Mark Twain??) ThumbsUp02.gif

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

 Posted: Tue Feb 22nd, 2011 11:25 pm
  PM Quote Reply
23rd Post
oagaspar
Site Founder


Joined: Sun Sep 4th, 2005
Location: Akron, USA
Posts: 28152
Status: 
Offline
the Kazimon Drei has a 4mm thick raised saph and is 17mm tall granted it's only 40mm but it wears very well.
...so this new Helson at 47mm with a 3.5mm raised saph and an overall height of 22.5mm should look pretty balanced on the wrist imo...I agree with Jeff that if the price is right I would also be in...
the bronze and Ti combo does look sweet...
ThumbsUp02.gif

Attachment: drei side crystal.jpg (Downloaded 54 times)

Back To Top PM Quote Reply  

 Posted: Wed Feb 23rd, 2011 01:46 pm
  PM Quote Reply
24th Post
Hammerfjord
Moderator


Joined: Thu Apr 16th, 2009
Location: Arctic, Norway
Posts: 5821
Status: 
Offline
Then it will cost you 1699$ shipped...
I'm giving up...
homerthinks.gif
http://www.helson-watch.com/news/

Back To Top PM Quote Reply

Current time is 06:15 pm Page:  First Page Previous Page  1  2  3  4  5  Next Page Last Page    
TimeTechTalk.com > Time Tech Talk > Time Talk > Latest Buzz on Peter Helson's Prototype Top



Lead Theme By: Di @ UltraBB
UltraBB 1.17 Copyright © 2007-2012 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.1352 seconds (40% database + 60% PHP). 35 queries executed.